Prodotti in Vetrina

iphone 6/6s squish purple case

SKU: EN-I10569

iphone 6/6s squish purple case

iphone 6/6s squish purple case iphone 6/6s squish purple case iphone 6/6s squish purple case iphone 6/6s squish purple case iphone 6/6s squish purple case iphone 6/6s squish purple case iphone 6/6s squish purple case iphone 6/6s squish purple case iphone 6/6s squish purple case iphone 6/6s squish purple case

iphone 6/6s squish purple case

Samsung has launched an advertising campaign that swipes at Apple's recently announced iPhone 5. "It doesn't take a genius" reads the tagline on one, followed by a side-by-side spec list comparing Apple's handset and the Samsung Galaxy S3. The thing is, it's weighted quite heavily in Samsung's favour. Admittedly Samsung does come up trumps in some of the categories ("A totally different plug" is one, and "2GB RAM" another), but at the same time it's filled out the list with as many features as it can, while missing out plenty of Apple's.

It compares the screen size and resolution of the two iphone 6/6s squish purple case phones, for example, with Apple's 4-inch screen offering 1,136x640 pixels, whereas Samsung's bigger 4.8-inch screen has 1,280x720 pixels, Bigger numbers! Winner! Not necessarily -- the number of pixels per inch is significantly higher on the iPhone, at 326 compared to the S3's (still impressive) 306, Samsung forgets to mention that, along with the fact it offers 4G from the get-go, whereas you'll have to buy a new version of the S3 to use 4G in the UK, Also conspicuous by its absence is any comparison of the two phones' app stores..

The Korean company took out another ad in The New York Times which reads: "On Sept 12th the next big thing was revealed" along with a picture of the Samsung Galaxy S3. "The Next Big Thing Is Already Here", the ad proclaims. As I say, I can't see this as anything but bitter sniping. Samsung must still be feeling red-faced after the court case that saw Apple awarded $1 billion over copyright infringement, while every single one of Samsung's claims were quashed. But I'm not sure this is the way to win any sympathy -- or sell more phones.

The iPhone 5 has already sold out, despite not coming with an adaptor to make it work with current docks, But it's not like the Galaxy S3 is struggling, It's shifted 20 million units in just 100 days since going on sale, which isn't bad going at all, Surely Samsung would be better off innovating and focusing on making its own phones, rather than sniping at competitors, What do you think of the iphone 6/6s squish purple case ads? Let me know in the comments below, or on our Facebook page, Update Monday 17 September: Added more comparison points between the two phones..

Problem is, Apple doesn't say much beyond that. So, I asked Anand Shimpi from chip review site Anandtech. It turns out that Anand's initial guess was wrong. Based on the performance gains, he initially believed the A6 used an ARM Cortex-A15 design. That's the latest and greatest from ARM, the chip architecture that powers virtually all of world's major-brand smartphones. But in a post on Saturday, he says that's not the case. "It turns out I was wrong," he wrote. "Based on a lot of digging over the past couple of days, and conversations with the right people, I've confirmed that Apple's A6 [chip] is based on Apple's own ARM based CPU core and not the Cortex A15," he wrote.